Biden:
The Chinese complication, Joe Biden & the European Union
The
People's Republic, its economic expansion and growing political influence is
the greatest challenge for the new government of a weakened and absent US after
four years of Trumpism.
Martin
Wolf, the great Financial Times analyst, a few years ago defined China as a
"premature superpower." A series of circumstances would have advanced
the place of the prevalence of the People's Republic but without consolidating
or maturing the necessary foundations to be in that place. Mindful of the
geopolitical impacts of the current pandemic and the meagre results of the
trade war with the US, this concept may have lost its rigor.
China
has been omnipresent in 2020 although not only due to the plague of the
coronavirus whose origin is attributed to Wuhan from where it would have been
transmitted to the world. The end of the year indicates that these two
protagonists, the disease and the Asian power, will continue to centralize the
scene forward, although for very different reasons. Contrary to what could have
been assumed just months ago, the People's Republic arrives in January 2021 as
one of the few winners of the drama that has shocked the world. This condition
determines the place that it intends or that it will definitely occupy on the
world stage after the change of power in the United States to Joe Biden, the other pole of the
geopolitical transformation that will take place in the coming months.
There
are three episodes in these hours, also linked by the pandemic, which should be
observed. One refers to the advancement of the times of development and
hegemony of the Asian power on horseback of the asymmetries that the disease
brought. Another, the escalation of the repression of the Xi Jinping regime, deliberately
ignoring the worldwide protest, with the significant case of the arrest of
journalist Zhang Zhan! Finally, the historic embrace that Germanized Europe has
just crowned with an unprecedented investment agreement with the Asian power!
China:
The first item on that list was detected, among others, by the Centre for
Economic and Business Research, a powerful London-based institute, which
determined that China will overtake the US as the leading global economy in
just seven years, much earlier than expected. They attribute this to the fact
that the Central Empire ends 2020 with an estimated growth of 2%, the only
major economy with advances in its GDP. On the contrary, the US will contract
by around 5% which will allow Beijing to close the gap. A significant piece of
data from this evaluation is provided by the fact that the People's Republic
already surpassed North America in the third quarter of the year that ended as
the largest trading partner of the European Union.
That
condition is what gives meaning to the pact announced this past Wednesday
between the European bloc and the People's Republic, firmly promoted by the
German Angela Merkel to leave it tied before the end of her rotating presidency
of the EU on December 31. A temporary issue that could indicate that it was not
intended to bluntly ignore the US and especially its imminent president, Joe
Biden, as everything indicates that it has happened.
The
episode confirms that the Atlantic relationship is damaged and it will require
time to stitch it up, although it will hardly return to the levels before
Donald Trump's anti-European campaign. But, besides, it confirms that the US is
not what it used to be today, although the EU came a long way from constituting
what some of its leaders suppose or dream of, an autonomous superpower between
the two giants.
The
Sino-European agreement has unique advantages for both parties. It provides
Beijing with a meaningful and pragmatically in the pure north of the world for
its technological and strategic developments such as the Silk Road. In return,
it cancels the obligation of mixed associations with Chinese firms for European
companies that invest in the People's Republic; the criterion of intellectual
property is broadened and the importance of the issue of state subsidies that
facilitate competition from Chinese companies is raised on the agenda. But,
essentially, it opens up to Europeans the immense Chinese market where
consumption, according to calculations by Goldman Sachs, will explain this year
that more than half of the national GDP begins: about 8.4 trillion dollars
compared to a product of 15, 6 trillion.
This
agreement is the second of great importance that the Chinese empire has crowned
in the last weeks of this dramatic 2020, apart, by the way, from the renewal of
the controversial secret pact with the Vatican. In November, Beijing launched
the Regional Comprehensive Economic Association (RCEP), the world's most
important free trade agreement, which unites 15 Asia-Pacific nations that
account for 30% of the global economy. It was the most complete synthesis of
the redesign of the geopolitical map. That space was led by the US with the
so-called Trans-Pacific Agreement that Barack Obama built and from which Trump
left in 2017. Beijing, which was not in that pact, now left the US out of this
enormous wealth-generating machine.
Biden rules out recovering that
initiative. He knows that winning support from a possibly Republican-dominant
Senate for a multilateral deal would be an impossible mission. China has unlikely
allies on Capitol Hill. But Biden is willing to rebuild bridges with Europe and
seek to speak with a single voice to reconfigure the link with China. It has an
understandable urgency. The last years of insularity and geopolitical
abdication of the United States, together with the soap opera of Trump denying
having lost the elections and backfiring the North American democracy, have
emboldened Chinese communism that is considered impervious to international
pressure.
The
case of Zhang, incarcerated to four years on ridiculous blames for reporting
what was unfolding in Wuhan at the beginning of the pandemic is an example of
that behaviour that adds to the pressure on Hong Kong or the repression of the
Uighur minority in the province from Xinjiang. As noted in Foreign Affairs,
Michéle Flournoy, Obama's deputy defence minister, "the greater the
Chinese leadership's confidence in its own capabilities, the greater the doubts
it harbours about the US's ability and resolve."
That
dynamic, where the emerging power sees the one it still governs as decadent,
lurks in a very dangerous risk zone. "An important miscalculation could
make Chinese leaders to finalise that they should - for example - continue on
Taiwan, and constitute a fait accompli that a weakened and the distracted US
would have to accept," the former official warns.
Biden
- These factors, together with the power are economic and therefore political
growth is what makes China the main puzzle Joe Biden will have to deal with.
Flournoy raises the need to build a deterrent to convince the Chinese
leadership that the US not only has "the ability to crush any aggression
but also that there is the will to do so. Today Beijing doubts both
aspects."
The
war between China and the United States is not commercial, although it was
established in those terms with the balance of an extraordinary cost in the
pockets of the Americans. According to a Fortune report, American companies
spent up to $46 billion by the end of 2019 for expenses generated by the
tariffs. But there are worse data. Bloomberg Economics recently estimated that
the trade war, apart from the pandemic, cut this 2020 some 316 billion dollars
to the North American economy.
The
war, which had those costs and little profit, has been for technological
supremacy. "The Chinese Communist Party understood that technology is the
way to power," The Economist warned a couple of months ago. The West
especially rejects the “Made in China 2025” initiative, a gigantic state
support structure for the development of semiconductors, robotics, supercomputers,
artificial intelligence, and telecommunications.
Lorand
Laskai, a researcher at the Council on Foreign Relations, argues that the goal
of the program "is not so much to join the ranks of high-tech economies
like Germany, the US, South Korea, and Japan, but to replace them
entirely." Made in China 2025 exists to achieve self-sufficiency through
technology substitution and to be the superpower that dominates the global
market in critical industries.
A
nightmare for America
Joe
Biden bets on the economic power of his country together with his allies to
limit Chinese claims, as he proposes in his famous article Why America Must
Lead Again. The Democrat, although he will maintain the tariffs against China,
for now, says that unlike Trump, he has a strategy to not only feign toughness.
In part, it is a $ 300 billion fund for research and development along with
another $ 400 billion packages to stimulate local production of critical and
high-value supplies, such as medical equipment, 5G telecommunications hardware,
and vehicles.
Electrical
The
purpose is for the US not to be dependent on China, a decoupling that will
moderate the formidable interaction of their country with the Asian economy.
But that will mean an increase in taxes for investment in these items, and of
course the rise in the cost of the products that would replace those that the
Asian giant provides at a bargain price. A difficult policy and without clarity
of results that will depend on the quality of alliances, especially economic
ones, that the US can rebuild. China, meanwhile, seems to be trying on its
clothes to return to being what it was for centuries.
Comments
Post a Comment